De La Fuente v. The Sherry Netherland, Inc. et al, No. 1:2017cv04759 - Document 62 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

Court Description: OPINION & ORDER re: 59 SECOND MOTION for Conference re: 58 CONSENT MOTION for Conference Pre-motion. filed by Roque De La Fuente; 61 MOTION for Conference filed by Roque De La Fuente; 42 M OTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by Michael J Horvitz, Arnold S. Gumowitz, Howard M Lorber, Edward L Gardner, Ira A. Lipman, The Sherry Netherland, Inc., Mary McInnis Boies, Wendy Carduner, Majorie Fisher Furman, Freder ic M Seegal; 46 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument on Motion to Dismiss addressed to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer from Peter T. Shapiro dated December 6, 2017 filed by Michael J Horvitz, Arnold S. Gumowitz, Howard M Lorber, Edward L Gardner , The Sherry Netherland, Inc., Ira A. Lipman, Majorie Fisher Furman, Wendy Carduner, Mary McInnis Boies, Frederic M Seegal; 58 CONSENT MOTION for Conference Pre-motion filed by Roque De La Fuente. For the above reasons, the C ourt dismisses De La Fuente's disparate impact and public accommodation claims, but denies the motion to dismiss his disparate treatment and other housing discrimination claims. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion s pending at Dkt. 42, 46, 58, 59, and 61. The parties are directed to jointly submit by April 6, 2018 a revised Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order in accordance with this Court's individual rules. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 3/27/2018) (anc)

Download PDF
De La Fuente v. The Sherry Netherland, Inc. et al Doc. 62 3/27/2018 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.