The Andy Warhol Foundation For The Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith et al, No. 1:2017cv02532 - Document 84 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: The Court has considered all the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed, the arguments are either moot or without merit. For the reasons explained above, AWF's motion for summary judgment is granted, and Goldsmith's motion for summary judgment is denied. Goldsmith's copyright infringement counterclaim is dismissed. AWF should submit a proposed judgment by July 8, 2019. Goldsmith may submit any objections or counter judgment by July 10, 2019. The Clerk is directed to close all pending motions. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 7/1/2019) (jca) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.

Download PDF
The Andy Warhol Foundation For The Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith et al Doc. 84 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 1 of 35 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 2 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 3 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 4 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 5 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 6 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 7 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 8 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 9 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 10 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 11 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 12 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 13 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 14 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 15 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 16 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 17 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 18 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 19 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 20 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 21 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 22 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 23 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 24 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 25 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 26 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 27 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 28 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 29 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 30 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 31 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 32 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 33 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 34 of 35 Case 1:17-cv-02532-JGK Document 84 Filed 07/01/19 Page 35 of 35

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.