Sarikaputar et al v. Veratip Corp. et al, No. 1:2017cv00814 - Document 71 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

Court Description: OPINION & ORDER re: 63 MOTION for Reargument re: 61 Memorandum & Opinion, MOTION for Reconsideration re; 61 Memorandum & Opinion filed by Michael P Bronstein. Defendant has failed to indicate exce ptional circumstances that lead this Court to disturb its previously reached conclusion. See Shrader, 70 F.3d at 257. Defendant has not identified a change in controlling law, new law, or a need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice. See Berg, 343 F.Supp.3d at 424. Thus, after careful consideration, Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration is hereby DENIED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 6/3/2019) (mro)