Dreamwear, Inc. v. B & P Intimates Inc. et al, No. 1:2016cv08973 - Document 9 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, the above-caption action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to effect service, Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 10/15/2019) (kv)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Dreamwear, Inc. v. B & P Intimates Inc. et al Doc. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DREAMWEAR, INC., Plaintiff, – against – OPINION AND ORDER 16 Civ. 8973 (ER) B & P INTIMATES INC., JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants. October 15, 2019 Ramos, D.J.: Plaintiff Dreamwear, Inc. commenced this action on November 18, 2016. Doc. 1. On November 21, 2016, the Court directed Plaintiff to refile their complaint due to several deficiencies therein. Plaintiff properly refiled their complaint on November 21, 2016, and a summons was issued on the same day. Doc. 6-7. Since then, there has been no activity in this case and the Court has not received any further communication from Plaintiff. The time period for service of the summons and amended complaint expired on March 18, 2017. To date, none of the defendants has been served and Plaintiff has not requested an extension of time to serve. Accordingly, the above-caption action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to effect service, Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 15, 2019 New York, New York ____________________________ Edgardo Ramos, U.S.D.J. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
