Cantillo Burgos v. United States of America, No. 1:2016cv06531 - Document 3 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER......ORDERED that Burgos August 16, 2016 motion for a sentencing reduction pursuant to Amendment 794 and § 3582(c)(2) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Burgos has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a federal right and, therefore, a certificate of appealability shall not be granted. Hoffler v. Bezio, 726 F.3d 144, 154 (2d Cir. 2013); Tankleff v. Senkowski, 135 F.3d 235, 241 (2d Cir. 1998); Rodriquez v. Scully, 905 F.2d 24, 24 (2d Cir. 1990). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Coppedge v. United States (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 3/2/2017) Copies Mailed By Chambers To Maria Frinet Cantillo Burgos (gr)

Download PDF
Cantillo Burgos v. United States of America Doc. 3 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.