Colon v. City Of New York, No. 1:2016cv04540 - Document 226 (S.D.N.Y. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER: Therefore, based upon my comments during the oral argument and for the reasons stated in my May 26, 2021 Opinion & Order (Doc. 195), it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to set aside my Opinion & Order dated May 26, 2021, (Doc. 1 95), is DENIED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer regarding a proposed scope of reopening discovery with regard to the New Evidence, and shall jointly file a letter on or before November 10, 2021, to inform this Court of their proposal, or, if they fail to reach an agreement, the areas of dispute regarding the scope of reopening discovery. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 11/4/2021) (mml)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Colon v. City Of New York UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------- X : SIBYL COLON, : : Plaintiff(s), : : - against : : : NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, : BRIAN CLARKE, MICHAEL KELLY, and : MELISSA MARK-VIVERITO, : : Defendant(s). : : --------------------------------------------------------- X Doc. 226 11/4/2021 16-CV-4540 (VSB) ORDER VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge: Today the parties appeared before me by telephone for an oral argument regarding whether I should reopen discovery in light of the newly discovered evidence (the “New Evidence”) submitted by Plaintiff, (see Docs. 212–15). The parties have agreed to stipulate the authenticity of the New Evidence. However, other than pointing to the New Evidence, which I find is only another item of evidence that supports Plaintiff’s theory that Hayward replaced her, Plaintiff did not present any argument as to why the issue of retaliation, among others, should not be tried by a jury. Therefore, based upon my comments during the oral argument and for the reasons stated in my May 26, 2021 Opinion & Order (Doc. 195), it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to set aside my Opinion & Order dated May 26, 2021, (Doc. 195), is DENIED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer regarding a proposed scope of reopening discovery with regard to the New Evidence, and shall jointly file a letter on Dockets.Justia.com or before November 10, 2021, to inform this Court of their proposal, or, if they fail to reach an agreement, the areas of dispute regarding the scope of reopening discovery. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 4, 2021 New York, New York ______________________ Vernon S. Broderick United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
