Nguedi v. The City of New York et al, No. 1:2016cv04430 - Document 68 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

Court Description: OPINION & ORDER re: 47 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by The City of New York, Bill Bratton, 53 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Brian Caulfield, 52 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Brian Caulfield. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motions for summary judgment are granted. The Court has been mindful of Plaintiffs pro se status, but nonetheless finds that no genuine dispute of material fact exists. Because the individual police officers were never served with the Amended Complaint, the claims against them are dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants; terminate the mo tions pending at docket entries forty- seven, fifty-two, and fifty-three; close the case; and mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 9/27/2018) (anc) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.

Download PDF
Nguedi v. The City of New York et al Doc. 68 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.