Islam et al v. BYO Co. (USA), Ltd., No. 1:2016cv00927 - Document 42 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: denying re: 27 MOTION to Certify Class Conditionally Under FLSA 216(b), filed by Ashraf Ahmed, Uzzol Siddiky, Bodrul Islam. Because Plaintiffs have not pled or alleged facts that plausibly demonstrate t hat they and other members of the proposed collective were victims of a common policy or plan that violates the FLSA, Plaintiff's motion for leave to disseminate notice to potential opt-in plaintiffs (Dkt. No. 27) is denied. The Clerk of the C ourt is directed to terminate the motion (Dkt. No. 27). The Court will conduct a conference in this matter on June 23, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 705 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York, and as further set forth in this order. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 6/20/2017) (ap) Modified on 6/21/2017 (ap).

Download PDF
Islam et al v. BYO Co. (USA), Ltd. Doc. 42 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.