ABKCO Music, Inc. et al v. Sagan et al, No. 1:2015cv04025 - Document 255 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: re: 161 MOTION for Summary Judgment - DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION filed by Bill Graham Archives, LLC, William Sagan, Norton LLC, 252 LETTER MOTION for Leave to File First Su pplemental Declaration of Matthew Lundberg addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Michael S. Elkin dated March 23, 2018 filed by Bill Graham Archives, LLC, William Sagan, Norton LLC, 191 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by EMI Unart Catalo g, Inc., Peer International Corporation, Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp., Spirit Catalog Holdings S.A.R.L., EMI Consortium Music Publishing, Inc., ABKCO Music, Inc., Songs of Peer, Ltd., EMI Blackwood Music Inc., EMI Feist Catalog Inc., PSO Lim ted, Screen-Gems-Emi Music Inc., EMI Consortium Songs, Inc., Stone Agate Music, Peermusic Ltd., EMI Robbins Catalog Inc., EMI April Music Inc., Stone Diamond Music Corp., Imagem Music LLC, Jobete Music Co., Inc., EMI Algee Music Corp., Spirit Tw o Music, Inc., WB Music Corp., Peermusic III, Ltd., Colgems-EMI Music Inc. Before the Court are the parties' cross motions for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 on Plaintiffs' claim of copyright infringement an d their request to permanently enjoin Defendants from using the recordings at issue. Docs. 161, 191. For the reasons set forth in a companion Opinion, the parties' motions for summary judgment are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court ha s provided the companion Opinion to the parties to obtain their views on whether certain materials covered by a joint Confidentiality and Protective Order, Doc. 41, are properly redacted. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions, Docs. 161, 191,252. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 3/30/2018) (ama)

Download PDF
ABKCO Music, Inc. et al v. Sagan et al Doc. 255 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.