Dukes v. NYCERS et al, No. 1:2015cv03846 - Document 100 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER: ORDER: As discussed at the conference on December 23, 2019, the Movant's Objections to Magistrate Judge Aaron's Opinion and Order dated June 24, 2019 are overruled. The Movants' motion to seal the deposition transcript of Dr. S ierros is granted. The plaintiff's application to file an amended complaint is granted. The proposed Second Amended Complaint, filed as Dkt. No. 94-1, is deemed filed as of December 23, 2019. The defendants may move or answer with respect to the Second Amended Complaint by January 24, 2020. If a motion is filed, the plaintiff may respond by February 7, 2020 and the defendants may reply by February 17, 2020. No pre-motion conference is necessary for a motion to dismiss. The Parties shall sub mit a proposed revised schedule to the Court by January 24, 2020. The Clerk of Court is directed to close Dkt. No. 92. SO ORDERED. Motions terminated: 92 MOTION to Amend/Correct 39 Amended Complaint, filed by Cheryl Dukes. Board of Trustees answer due 1/24/2020; NYCERS answer due 1/24/2020. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 12/23/2019) (va)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.