Rahman v. Shanahan et al, No. 1:2015cv03406 - Document 12 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)

Court Description: OPINION & ORDER. Since Rahman has been detained for more than 15 months, his request for a bond hearing before an immigration judge is GRANTED. The immigration judge is directed to provide Rahman with an individualized bond hearing in accordance w ith the procedures described by the Second Circuit or else release Rahman. The Government is ordered to file a letter with the Court within thirty days of this Order confirming compliance. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close 15 cv 3406. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 11/2/2015) (lmb)

Download PDF
Rahman v. Shanahan et al Doc. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------X : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : AMINUR RAHMAN, Plaintiff, -againstCHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN, New York Field Office Director for the Office of Detention and Removal for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al. Defendants. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: _________________ DATE FILED: November 2, 2015 15 Civ. 3406 (PAC) OPINION & ORDER ------------------------------------------------------------X HONORABLE PAUL A. CROTTY, United States District Judge: Petitioner Aminur Rahman is a citizen of Bangladesh who entered the United States on June 28, 1991 as a legal permanent resident. On October 2, 2007, Rahman pleaded guilty in New York Supreme Court (Queens) to robbery in the third degree and bail jumping in the second degree, in violation of N.Y. Pen. Laws §§ 160.05 and 215.56. He was sentenced to 18 months’ imprisonment, but was released in December 2007. Six-and-a-half years after his release, the Government commenced removal proceedings against Rahman on July 3, 2014. Since then, Rahman has been detained in Orange County Correctional Facility pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act’s mandatory detention provision at 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c). On April 30, 2015, Rahman initiated this habeas action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, seeking among other remedies an individualized bond hearing to establish whether continued detention is justified. Rahman argues that his continued detention violates his due process rights under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. 1 Dockets.Justia.com On October 28, 2015, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals decided Lora v. Shanahan, No. 14-2343-pr, slip op. (2d Cir. 2015). The court held that “in order to avoid the constitutional concerns raised by indefinite detention, an immigrant detained pursuant to section 1226(c) must be afforded a bail hearing before an immigration judge within six months of his or her detention.” Id. at 24. At that hearing, the court held, “the detainee must be admitted to bail unless the government establishes by clear and convincing evidence that the immigrant poses a risk of flight or danger to the community.” Id. Since Rahman has been detained for more than 15 months, his request for a bond hearing before an immigration judge is GRANTED. The immigration judge is directed to provide Rahman with an individualized bond hearing in accordance with the procedures described by the Second Circuit or else release Rahman. The Government is ordered to file a letter with the Court within thirty days of this Order confirming compliance. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close 15 cv 3406. Dated: New York, New York November 2, 2015 SO ORDERED ________________________ PAUL A. CROTTY United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.