Sklodowska-Grezak v. Stein et al, No. 1:2015cv01670 - Document 99 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER #107053 re: 96 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 94 Memorandum & Opinion, filed by Grazyna Sklodowska-Grezak. The motion for reconsideration is denied. The Clerk is directed to close ECF No. 96. The Court has also entered a separate Memorandum Opinion and Order dismissing this case. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 2/20/2017) (cf) Modified on 2/21/2017 (ap).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Sklodowska-Grezak v. Stein et al Doc. 99 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GRAZYNA SKLOWDOWSKA-GREZAK, 15-cv-1670 Plaintiff, - against JUDITH A. STEIN, PH.D, ET AL., MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendants. JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: The Court has received the plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, ECF No. 96. “The standard for granting [a motion for reconsideration] is strict, and reconsideration will generally be denied unless the moving party can point to controlling decisions or data that the court overlooked.” Shrader v. CSX Trasp., Inc., 70 F.3d 255, 257 (2d Cir. 1995). The plaintiff has failed to make such a showing, and has not pointed to any information that “might reasonably be expected to alter the conclusion reached by the court.” Id. The motion for reconsideration is denied. The Clerk is directed to close ECF No. 96. The Court has also entered a separate Memorandum Opinion and Order dismissing this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York February 20, 2017 /s/___________________________ John G. Koeltl United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
