Thomas v. Colvin, No. 1:2015cv00948 - Document 22 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: No party has objected to the R&R. The Court has reviewed Judge Fox's thorough R&R and finds no error, clear or otherwise. Judge Fox reached his determination after a careful review of the parties' submissions. (Doc. 21at4 -11.) Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Fox's R & R dated September 15, 2015 in its entirety and Thomas's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a judgment in favor of Respondent and to close this case. As Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); see also, e.g., Matthews v. United States, 682 F.3d 180, 1 85 (2d Cir. 2012). In addition, the parties' failure to file written objections precludes appellate review of this decision. PSG Poker, LLC v. DeRosa-Grund, No. 06 CIV. 1104 (DLC), 2008 WL 3852051, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 15, 2008) (citing United States v. Male Juvenile, 121 F.3d 34, 38 (2d Cir. 1997)). (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 10/16/2015) (kko)

Download PDF
Thomas v. Colvin Doc. 22 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.