Donoghue et al v. Retrophin, Inc. et al, No. 1:2014cv07640 - Document 98 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT: 1. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action, over the Plaintiffs, over Retrophin, and over Shkreli. 2. The Court finds that Plaintiffs, through their counsel, have vigorously prosecuted the claims set forth in the Second Amended Complaint on behalf of Retrophin. 3. The Stipulation is hereby approved as fair, reasonable and adequate and in the best interests of Retrophin and of its shareholders. T he parties are directed to consummate the Settlement in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Stipulation. 4. This Order and Final Judgment shall not constitute evidence of, or an admission by, Plaintiffs, Shkreli or Retrophin respecting th e validity or invalidity of any of the claims or defenses asserted by Plaintiffs or Shkreli as to liability or lack thereof with respect to any such claim or defense or for any recovery sought in the above-referenced matter, or of any wrongdoing or l ack of wrongdoing by Shkreli whatsoever. 5. The Second Amended Complaint is hereby dismissed on the merits, with prejudice and without costs, except as otherwise provided for herein. 6. Shkreli is hereby discharged and released from the "RELEASE D CLAIMS," as that term is defined in the Stipulation. 7. The PLAINTIFF RELEASING PARTIES, as that term is defined in the Stipulation, are permanently barred and enjoined from instituting any other action, in this or any other court or tribunal of this or any other jurisdiction, raising claims which could have been asserted in this Action against Shkreli for trading in Retrophin securities (as defined in 17 CFR § 240.3a11-1 under the Act) or derivative securities thereof (as defined in 17 CFR § 240.16a-1(c) under the Act), including, without limitation, options to acquire Retrophin securities or any other derivative security or instrument tied to the value of any Retrophin equity security, during the 16(b) Trading Period, reg ardless of the theory of liability. 8. Plaintiff's counsel are hereby awarded an attorneys' fee (inclusive of reimbursement of costs and disbursements) in the sum of $600,000, which sum the Court finds to be fair, reasonable and adequa te and which shall be paid to Plaintiffs' counsel by Shkreli after this Order has become Final as set forth in paragraphs 1 and 10 of the Stipulation. 9. The Court reserves jurisdiction over all matters relating to the enforcement, administratio n and performance of the Stipulation. 10. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to enter and docket this Order and Final Judgment in this Action, and to close the case. It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 12/2/2015) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal Form #1, # 2 Right to Appeal Form #2) (rjm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Donoghue et al v. Retrophin, Inc. et al Doc. 98 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DEBORAH DONOGHUE and AARON RUBENSTEIN, Plaintiffs - against - ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT RETROPHIN, INC., 14 Civ. 7640 (ER) Nominal Defendant, and MARTIN SHKRELI, Defendant. Ramos, D.J.: Deborah Donoghue and Aaron Rubenstein (“Plaintiffs”), shareholders of nominal defendant Retrophin, Inc. (“Retrophin”), brought this action (the “Action”) pursuant to Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Act”), on behalf of Retrophin, to recover so called “short-swing profits” alleged to have been realized by the defendant Martin Shkreli (“Shkreli”), in connection with his alleged purchases and sales of Retrophin securities (as defined in 17 CFR § 240.3a11-1 under the Act) or derivative securities (as defined in 17 CFR § 240.16a-1(c) under the Act) within the time beginning November 22, 2013 and ending November 28, 2014 (the “16(b) Trading Period”). The Court has considered: (1) whether the terms and conditions of the Stipulation of Settlement dated September 18, 2015 (Doc. 95, Ex. A) (annexed hereto as Exhibit A) (the “Stipulation”), including the release of Shkreli, are fair, reasonable and adequate for the settlement of all claims asserted by Plaintiffs in the Action and should be approved; (2) whether judgment should be entered dismissing the Second Amended Complaint with prejudice; (3) Dockets.Justia.com whether and what to award counsel for Plaintiffs as a reasonable attorneys’ fee and reimbursement of costs and expenses. Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms shall have the meanings set forth in the Stipulation. The Court has considered all matters submitted to it on this motion, including the Stipulation, and all prior papers and proceedings in this Action. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT: 1. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action, over the Plaintiffs, over Retrophin, and over Shkreli. 2. The Court finds that Plaintiffs, through their counsel, have vigorously prosecuted the claims set forth in the Second Amended Complaint on behalf of Retrophin. 3. The Stipulation is hereby approved as fair, reasonable and adequate and in the best interests of Retrophin and of its shareholders. The parties are directed to consummate the Settlement in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Stipulation. 4. This Order and Final Judgment shall not constitute evidence of, or an admission by, Plaintiffs, Shkreli or Retrophin respecting the validity or invalidity of any of the claims or defenses asserted by Plaintiffs or Shkreli as to liability or lack thereof with respect to any such claim or defense or for any recovery sought in the above-referenced matter, or of any wrongdoing or lack of wrongdoing by Shkreli whatsoever. 5. The Second Amended Complaint is hereby dismissed on the merits, with prejudice and without costs, except as otherwise provided for herein. 6. Shkreli is hereby discharged and released from the “RELEASED CLAIMS,” as that term is defined in the Stipulation. 2 7. The PLAINTIFF RELEASING PARTIES, as that term is defined in the Stipulation, are permanently barred and enjoined from instituting any other action, in this or any other court or tribunal of this or any other jurisdiction, raising claims which could have been asserted in this Action against Shkreli for trading in Retrophin securities (as defined in 17 CFR § 240.3al 1-1 under the Act) or derivative securities thereof (as defined in 17 CFR § 240.16a-l(c) under the Act), including, without limitation, options to acquire Retrophin securities or any other derivative security or instrument tied to the value of any Retrophin equity security, during the 16(b) Trading Period, regardless of the theory of liability. 8. Plaintiff's counsel are hereby awarded an attorneys' fee (inclusive of reimbursement of costs and disbursements) in the sum of $600,000, which sum the Court finds to be fair, reasonable and adequate and which shall be paid to Plaintiffs' counsel by Shkreli after this Order has become Final as set forth in paragraphs 1 and 10 of the Stipulation. 9. The Court reserves jurisdiction over all matters relating to the enforcement, administration and performance of the Stipulation. 10. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to enter and docket this Order and Final Judgment in this Action, and to close the case. It is SO ORDERED. Dated: December 2, 2015 New York, New York Edgardo Ramos, U.S.D.J. 3 EXHIBIT A UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DEBORAH DONOGHUE and AARON RUBENSTEIN, Plaintiffs, Index No. 14 Civil 7640 (ER) - againstRETROPHIN, INC., Nominal Defendant, and MARTIN SHKRELI, Defendant. STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT By and through their respective attomeys, the parties to the above-captioned action (the "ACTION"), plaintiffs Deborah Donogbue and Aaron Rubenstein ("PLAINTIFFS"). nominal defendant Retrophin. Inc. ("RETROPHIN"). and defendant Martin Shkreli ("SHKRELI") (individually. "PARTY"; collectively. the "PARTIES"), have entered into the following Stipulation of Settlement ("STIPULATION" or ·'SETTLEMENT"). subject to the approval of the Court. RECITALS WHEREAS, PLAINTIFFS, shareholders of RETROPHIN, brougbt this ACTION pursuant to Section 16(b) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934. as amended (the "ACT"), On behalf of RETROPHIN. to recover so-called "short-swing profits" alleged to have been realized by SHKRELI in connection with his alleged purchases and sales of RETROPHIN securities (as defrned in 17CFR§ 240.3all-1 under the ACT)orderivative security tllereof (as defined in 17 CFR § 240.16a-l{c) under the ACT) witllin the time 1 ....... .. ...... period beginning November 22,2013 and ending November 28,2014 (the k16(b) TRADING PERIOD"); WHEREAS, PLAINTIFFS assert claims in this ACTION by alleging that SHKRELI purchased and sold RETROPHIN securities, or is deemed to have purchased and sold RETROPHIN securities, that may be matched against one another to produce profits recoverable under the ACT; WHEREAS, PLAINTIFFS assert that the potential profit realized under Section 16(b) exceeds six million dollars and have shared their discovery and anal ysisregarding liability with counsel for SHKRELI and counsel for RETROPHIN; WHEREAS, SHKRELI believes he has meritorious defenses to some of PLAINTIFFS' Section 16(b) claims and that his liability is substantially lower than PLAINTIFFS claim; WHEREAS, SHKRELI denies liability in excess of$605,720, and this STIPULATION shall in no event be construed or deemed to be evidence of or an admission or concession On the part of SHKRELI with respect to any allegations or fault or wrongdoing or damages, or to any liability in excess of $605,720, or any deficiency in the defenses SHKRELI may have or may assert. WHEREAS, should SHKRELl's defen,ses have merit, recoverable profits wouJd be diminished well below the recovery here provided; WHEREAS, given the risks and uncertainties of the outcome of the ACTION and any subsequent appeal, the PLAINTIFFS, SHKRELI and RETROPHIN have concluded that it is in the interest of all PARTIES to settle this ACTION on the terms herein set forth; 2 - - - - - - _... _- ....._ - - - - _.... _ - - - - - ...._ - - - - .....- --- WHEREAS, the PARTIES, through their COllll5eJ, have conducted substantial investigations relating tp the claims and the underlying events alleged in the Second Amended Complaint and the defenses thereto. The PARTIES obtained extensive discovery from RETROPHIN and from third parties, including depositions and trading records,.as a result of which the PARTIES have concluded that they are fully informed in entering into the settlement contemplated by this STIPULATION: WHEREAS, the PARTIES have engaged in good filith, ann's length and fully IIdversarial negotiations among themselves which culminated in agreement for SHKREU to pay Two Million Six Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($2,625,000) dollllIS (the "SETILEMENT AMOUNT") in settlement ofthis ACTION; WHEREAS, the PARTIES and all counsel agree that a settlement of this ACTION on the terms described herein is filir, reasonable, adequate and in the best interests of aU concerned; WHEREAS, in evaluating the proposed SETTLEMENT provided for herein, PLAINTIFFS and RETROPHIN have considered the substantial benefit being provided to RETROPHIN and its shareholders, the risks and uncertainties of the outcome of this ACTION and any subsequent appeal, the delay until there would he a final adjudication and additionallegaJ fees and expenses which could reduce the ultimate recovery, wheUter on a litigated judgment if PLAINTIFFS were to prevail, or by settlement; and WHEREAS, SHKREU has agreed to this STIPULATION in order to fully and finally settle and dispose ofall RELEASED CLAIMS and to avoid the continuing butllen, expense, uncertainty, inconvenience and distraction ofprotracted litigation. 3 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is.hereby acknowledged, as.. follows: SETTLEMENT CONSIDERATION 1. Subject to the provisions ofParagraph 9, below, on or before the tenth business day after the ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT (as defined below) approving the SETTLEMENT becomes Final, SHKRELI shall payor cause to be paid to RETROPHlN the sum 0[$2,025,000 (the "SETfLEMENT PAYMENT,,) and shall pay or cause to be paid to counsel for PLAINTIFFS the sum of $600,000 (the "LEGAL FEES PAYMENT"). RETROPHlN and counsel for PLAINTIFFS shall provide complete wire transfer instructions to counsel for SHKRELI on or before the day the ORDER AND . FINAL JUDGMENT (as defined below) approving the SETTLEMENT becomes Finai. The SETfLEMENT PAYMENT shall be p,aid by wire transfer to RETROPHIN, and the LEGAL FEES PAYMENT shall be paid by wire transfer to for PLAINTIFFS. Except for SHKRELI'S transmittal of the SETfLEMENT PAYMENT and the LEGAL FEES PAYMENT, together comprising the SETTLEMENT AMOUNT, no PARTY shall be required to bear any other expense, cost, damage, or fee alleged or incurred by any other PARTY, or by any of their attorneys, experts, advisors, agents, or representatives in connection with this ACTION, or to implernent this SETfLEMENT. SUBMISSION AND APPLICATION TO THE COURT 2. On October 16,2015, PLAINTIFFS shall move the Court for a determination, supported by. SHKRELI and RETROPHIN, whether the SETfLEMENJ its shouid be approved as fillr, reasonable, adequate and in the interest ofRETROPHIN shareholders, and for entry of an Order and Finai Judgment (the "ORDER AND FINAL 4 .1 :) \'. EB JUDGMENT") substantially in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit A, which will: a) Dismiss this ACTION with prejudice; b) Find that the PLAINTIFFS vigorously prosecuted the claims set forth in the Second Amended Complaint on behalf of RETROPHIN; c) Find that the terms ofthe SETILEMENT are fair, reasonable, adequate IJDd in the best interests of RETROPHIN and itS shareholders; and d) Effectuate the RELEASED CLAIMS as defined below. 3. '.1 Tbe ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT shall become final following entry either by expiration of the ,time for appeal or review of such ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT or, if any appeal is filed and not dismissed, after the ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT is affirmed on appeal and is no longer subject to review upon appeal or by writ of certiorari or motion for reconsideration. RELEASE OF CLAIMS 4. In consideration ofthe SErILEMENT PAYMENT and the LEGAL FEES PAYMENT, the RETROPHIN RELEASING PARTIES and the PLAINTIFF RELEASING PARTIES (each defined below, together the ",RELEASING PARTIES,,), each release and discharge the SHKRELI RELEASED PARTIES (defined below), from any and all liability,including without limitation any costs and disbursements, based tr,:.on claims under Section 16(b) ofthe ACT and the rules and regulations promUlgated < , ", Section 16 ofthe ACT caused by SHKRELI'S TRADlN'G (which is defined to inc1ud"., without limitation SHKREU's purchase, sale, disposition, acquisition, pledge, gift or,c transfer of, or any transaction involving) in RETROPHIN securities (as defmed in 17 CPR § 24O.3al1-1 under the ACT) or derivative securities thereof (as defined in 17 CFR § 240. 16o-1(c) under the ACT) during the 16(b)TRADINGPERlOD that were asserte<\or 5 '. !, could have been asserted in this ACTION, whether brought individually, directly, representatively, derivatively or in any other capacity, to the extent such TRADING (and the matching TRADING giving rise to the alleged liability under the ACn was reported by SHKREI.J on Form 49 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the .I "RELEASED CLAIMS»). a. "PLAINTIFF RELEASING PARTIES" shall mean (I) PLAINTIFFS, th6ir family, associates, personal or legal representatives, employees, attorneys, financial or investment advisors, other advisors, consultants, accountants, trustees, heirs, executors, successors, assigns, partnerships, limited liabi:ity companies, estates, administrators, and assigns; and (ii) any and all owners of any RETROPHIN security (as defined in 17 CFR § 24O.3all'l undertbe ACl) or derivative security thereof (as defined in 17 CFR § under the ACT), or any of them, other than RETROPHIN itself, not any Such releasing parties were named, served with process, or appaared in this ACTION. b. ''RETROPHIN RELEASING PARTIES" shall mean RETROPHIN audits present and former officers, directors, attorneys, parents, affiliates, ., successors and assigns (including their respective fiunilies, parent entiti?" associates, affiliates or subsidiaries), to the extent it has authority to their behalf, whether or not any such releasing parties were named, with process, or appeared in this ACTION. . c. "SHKREI.J RELEASED PARTIES" shall SHKRELI and bis and his heirs, executors, and administrators lIf>ting in their capacity as his . 6 - - - - - - - _ ............_ ..... _---- heirs, executors or administrators, whether or not any such released parties . were named, served with process, or appeared in this ACTION: 5. " The PLAINTIFF RELEASING PARTIES covenant not to bring any additional claims arising out of or relating to the assertions contained in the Second i\ Amended Complaint in this ACTION or that could have been asserted in this ACTION, against SHKRELI for TRADING in RETROPHIN securities (as defined in 17. CFR § 240.3al1-1 under the ACT) or derivative security thereof (as defined in 17 CFR § 240.16a·1 (c) under the ACT), including, without limitation, options to acquire RETROPHIN securities or any other derivative security or instrument tied to the value of any RETROPHIN equity security, during the 16(b) TRADING PERIOD, regardless ofthe theory of liability. 6. The RELEASED CLAIMS contemplated by this STIPULATION shaii extend to any RELEASED CLAIMS that the RELEASING PARTIES do not know or suspect to exist at the time of the. release, which if known, might have affected the RELEASING PARTIES' decision to enter into the release. The RELEASING PARTIP..8 shall be deemed to relinquish, to the extent applicable to the RELEASED CLAIMS, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, the provisions, rights and benefits of Section 1542 of the California Civil Code, which states that: A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN IDS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERlALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR. The RELEASING PARTIES shall be deemed to waive any and alI provisions, rights amI benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle of 7 ·.c common law, which is similar, comparable or equivalent to California Civil Code Section 1542 to the extent applicable to the RELEASED CLAIMS. The RELEASING PARTIES acknowledge that they may discover facts in addition to or different from those that they now know or believe to be true with respect to the RELEASED CLAIMS, but that it is their intention to fully, finally, and forever settle and release the RELEASED CLAIMS, whedler known or unknown, suspectea or unsuspected, which now exist or heretofore existed, ilnd without regard to the subsequeut discovery or existence of such additioDal or differeut facts. CONDITIONS OF SETTLEMENT 7. This STIPULATION and all negotiations and papers related to it, and any proceedings in connection with the SETTLEMENT, wbether or not the SETILEMENJ; becomes final or is consummated, are not and shall not be construed, and sbaII not be : I construed to be evidence of, or an admission by, any of the PARTIES respectingthe,. validity or invalidity of any of the claims or defenses asserted by PLAINTIFFS or SHKRELI as to liability or lack thereofwith respect to any such claim or defense or fOrl/llY recovery sought in this ACTION, or of any wrongdoing or IjlCk of wrongdoing by .. SHKRELI whatsoever, and sbaII not be offered for admission or received as evidence in ,any action against SHKRELI of any sucb liability or wrongdoing or lack thCl:e!lf by him. 8. Any dispute between PLAINTIFFS and RETROPHIN regarding attorneys' fees and expenses, or any decision by the Court to approve an attorneys' fees and expCllses award less than the amount of attorneys' fees and expenses sought by PLAINTIFFS shpll not void the SETTLEMENT. ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES 9. ,PLAINTIFFS will apply to the Court for attorneys' fees and expenses ,in the 8 amount of Six Hundred Thousand ($600,000) dollars, which RETROPIDN has agreed to· . support (the LEGAL FEES PAYMENT as defined above in paragraph 1). The LEGAL FEES PAYMENT was negotiated between counsel for PLAlNTIFFS and counsel for RETROPHIN after the PARTIES had negotiated the provisions of the SETTLEMENT set forth above. Such attorneys' fees and expenses as may be awarded by the Court, not to exceed the sum of the LEGAL FEES PAYMENT, are to be paid by SHKRELI to counsel , for PLAINTIFFS after the Order and Final Judgment becomes Finai in accordance with Paragraph 3. If the Court awards less than $600,000 in attorneys' fees and expenses, then Shkreli shall decrease the LEGAL FEES PAYMENT so that it matches the amount ordered by the Court, and ShkreH shall increase the SE'ITLEMENT PAYMENT by a corresponding amount, so that the sum of the two payments,equals the SETTLEMENT1· AMOUNT of $2,625,000. The SETTLEMR'\IT is in no way contingent upon any attorneys' fees and expenses being awarded. 10. PLAINTIFFS agree and acknowledge that the award of attorneys' fees1ll,\d expenses as described in Paragraph 9 is the sole amount to which PLAINTIFFS and ;'. counsel for PLAINTIFFS are due in connection with this ACTIO:'ol' or this STIPULATIQN and expressly release and disclaim any right to any additional amount. RETROPHIN and SHKREU acknowledge and agree that, as a result 11. PLAlNTlFFS' pursuit of this ACTION and their pursuit and negotiation.ofthis "r STIPULATION, this action has been diligently prosecuted against SHKREU within the meaning of Section 16(b) of the ACT. . Any order or proceeding relating to the award of attorneys' fees and 12. expenses, or any appcai from any order relating thereto or reversai or modification thereof, 9 ( ---------- ....... ..... shall not operate to terminate or cancel this STIPULATION, or affect or delay the finality of the ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT. MISTAKE 13. In entering into this STIPULATION, the PARTIES assume the risk of any mistake offacl or law. lithe PARTIES, or any of them, should later discover that any·fact they relied upon in entering into this SETILEMENT is not true, or that their understanding of the facts or law was incorrect, the PARTIES shall not be entitled to seek rescission of this SETILEMENT, or otherwise attack the validity ofthe SETILEMENT, based on any such mistake. This SETILEMENT is intended to be fmal and binding upon the PARTIES regardless of any mistake.offac! or·law. ENTIRE AGREEMENT 14. This STIPULATION contains the entire agreement among the PARTIES concerning the subject matter hereof and no PARTY is relying upon any representation, promise or assertion not contained herein. COUNTERPARTS 15. This STIPULATION may be executed in one or more actual or counterparts, each ofwhich shall be deemed an original ofthe STIPULATION and all,,:,f which, when taken together, shall be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement .' itt' provided that 00 PARTY shall be bound hereby unless and until aU PARTIES shall hajl'e executed and delivered this STIPULATION. AUTHORITY 16. The individuals signing this STIPULATION ,represent that they have tb,:: authority from his or her cHentCs) to execute, to release the RELEASED CLAIMS herein . :\ , identified, to compromise and settie all his or her client's claims and defenses, and to bind 10 ....- .... .... ...- -- ....... ... ... --- ·her or her client, subject to Court supervision: AMENDMENT 17. This STIPULATION may not he modified or amended, nor may any of its provisions be waived except by a writing signed by ail PARTIES hereto that n:fers :.j specificai1y to this STIPULATION. t, JURISDICTION 18. .", The PARTIES submit to the continuing jurisdiction ofthis Court for ail purposes relating to this ACTION and any disputes over this STIPULATION and its enforcement, CONSTRUCTION 19. This STIPULATION shall be construed in all respects as jointly dlafted and shall not be construed, in any way, against any f ARTY on the groUnd that the PARTY or . its counsel drafted this STIPULATION. BINDING EFFECT 20. This STIPULATION, and. all rights and powers granted hereby. will bind ·and inure to the benefit of the PARTIES hereto. and their respective agents. executors. , heirs, successors, assigns, employees. and employers. NON-ASSIGNMENT OF CLAIMS 21. PLAINTIFFS represent and warrant that none ofthe claims or causes of action referred to in any complaint or amended complaint in this ACTION have been assigned, encumbered, or in any manner transferred in whole or part. " SEVERABILITY 22. If any provision oflms STIPULATION is held to be illegal. invalid. or unenforceable. then: (i) such provision will be fully severable; (Ii) this STIPULATION 11 - - - - - .. _ - - " , - - - - - - - - - .. _ - - - , . _ - - , . _ - - - - - - - - will be construed and enforced as if such illegal, invalid, or unenforceable provision hlIli never comprised part ofthis STIPULATION; wid (iii) the remaining provisions of this STIPULATION will remain in full force and effect and win not be affected by the illegal, invalid or unenforcc:able provision or by its severance from this STIPULAnON. 12 - - - .....- _. __ .._-_... _ - - - ....._ - - - - - - - - .... _ . _ - - - - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have executed this SETrLEMENT effective as of the date noted below. Dated: Southamp¢n, New York October.l9 2015 Dated: David ez 171 Ed e of Woods Road, PO ox 323 Southampton, New York 11968 Tel: 631.287.5520 Fax: 631.283.4735 DavidLopezEsq@ao1.com E IssaPre im D,C. October:;z.., 2015 Amold&P 601 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 Tel: 202.942.5000 Fax: 202,942.5999 Elissa.Preheiin@aporter,com Attorneyfor Plaintiffs Attorneysfor Defondant Martin Shkrelf Dated: New York, New York October .-!., 2015 Dated: New York, New York o ber 1..2015 Miriam Tauber Miriam Tauber Law 885 Park Avenue, 2A New York, New York_1OO?5 Tel: (323) 790-4881 111 Avenue ofthe Americas New York, New York 10036 Tel: 212.479.6000 Fax: Fax: miriamtauberlaw@gmail.com ishapiro@Cooley.com Attorneyfor Plaintiffs Attorneysfor Nominal Defondant Retrophin, Inc. Co Ie 13 - - ....... .. ------- ..
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
