Roseman v. Bloomberg, L.P., No. 1:2014cv02657 - Document 290 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons discussed above, the Court denies Bloomberg's motions to dismiss at this time. However, plaintiffs Edward DaCosta, Catherine Fox, and Joseph Marfil shall respond to Bloomberg's document requests and shall file affidavits with the Court signaling their intent to remain in this litigation no later than May 19, 2017. Failure to comply with this order shall result in dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (b). This Opinion and Order resolves Docket Numbers 152 and 169. SO ORDERED. re: 169 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Bloomberg, L.P. 152 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Bloomberg, L.P. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 4/4/2017) (rjm)

Download PDF
Roseman v. Bloomberg, L.P. Doc. 290

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.