Securities and Exchange Commission v. Davis et al, No. 1:2014cv01528 - Document 174 (S.D.N.Y. 2022)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT JOEL SANDERS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchan ge Act") [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in co nnection with the purchase or sale of any security: As further set forth by this Order. Defendant shall pay the total of disgorgement and prejudgment interest due of $95,029.71 in seven (7) installments to the Commission according to the follow ing schedule: (1) $19,005.94, within thirty (30) days of entry of this Final Judgment; (2) $12,670.63, within ninety (90) days of entry of this Final Judgment; (3) $12,670.63, within one hundred and eighty (180) days of entry of thi s Final Judgment; (4) $12,670.63, within two hundred and seventy (270) days of entry of this Final Judgment; (5) $12,670.63, within three hundred and sixty (360) days of entry of this Final Judgment; (6) $12,670.63, within four hundred and fifty (450) days of entry of this Final Judgment; (7) $12,670.63, within five hundred and forty (540) days of entry of this Final Judgment. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate all open motions and close the case. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 10/3/2022) (tg)

Download PDF
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Davis et al Doc. 174 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 10/03/2022 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, 14-CV-01528 (VEC) v. JOEL SANDERS, Defendant. [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT JOEL SANDERS The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) having filed a Complaint and Defendant Joel Sanders having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; 1 Dockets.Justia.com (b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). III. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, pursuant to Exchange Act Section 21(d)(2) [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(2)], Defendant is prohibited from acting as an officer or director of any issuer that has a class of securities registered pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78l] or that is required to file reports pursuant to Exchange Act Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. IV. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $86,250.00, representing net profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $8,779.71. The Court finds that sending the disgorged funds to the United States Treasury, as ordered below, is consistent with equitable principles. Defendant shall pay the total of disgorgement and prejudgment interest due of $95,029.71 in seven (7) installments to the Commission according to the following schedule: (1) $19,005.94, within thirty (30) days of entry of this Final Judgment; (2) $12,670.63, within ninety (90) days of entry of this Final Judgment; (3) $12,670.63, within one hundred and eighty (180) days of entry of this Final Judgment; (4) $12,670.63, within two hundred and seventy (270) days of entry of this Final Judgment; (5) $12,670.63, within three hundred and sixty (360) days of 3 entry of this Final Judgment; (6) $12,670.63, within four hundred and fifty (450) days of entry of this Final Judgment; (7) $12,670.63, within five hundred and forty (540) days of entry of this Final Judgment. Payments shall be deemed made on the date they are received by the Commission and shall be applied first to post judgment interest, which accrues pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961 on any unpaid amounts due after thirty (30) days of the entry of Final Judgment. Prior to making the final payment set forth herein, Defendant shall contact the staff of the Commission for the amount due for the final payment. If Defendant fails to make any payment by the date agreed and/or in the amount agreed according to the schedule set forth above, all outstanding payments under this Final Judgment, including post-judgment interest, minus any payments made, shall become due and payable immediately at the discretion of the staff of the Commission without further application to the Court. Defendant may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request. Payment may also be made directly from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm. Defendant may also pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to Enterprise Services Center Accounts Receivable Branch 6500 South MacArthur Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73169 4 and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, and name of this Court; Joel Sanders as a defendant in this action; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. Defendant shall simultaneously transmit photocopies of evidence of payment and case identifying information to the Commission’s counsel in this action. By making this payment, Defendant relinquishes all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in such funds and no part of the funds shall be returned to Defendant. The Commission shall send the funds paid pursuant to this Final Judgment to the United States Treasury. The Commission may enforce the Court’s judgment for disgorgement and prejudgment interest by using all collection procedures authorized by law, including, but not limited to, moving for civil contempt at any time after thirty (30) days following entry of this Final Judgment. Defendant shall pay post judgment interest on any amounts due after thirty (30) days of the entry of this Final Judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. V. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. VI. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523, the allegations in the Complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement 5 entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(19). VII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. Dated: ______________, 2022 October 03 HON. VALERIE E. CAPRONI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate all open motions and close the case. 6

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.