Villarreal v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 1:2013cv06253 - Document 27 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER re: 19 MOTION to Remand to Social Security Administration . filed by Commissioner of Social Security. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Michael H. Dolinger, recommending that De fendant's motion to remand the case to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings be granted. The factual and legal bases underlying the Report are not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Accordingly, the Rep ort is ADOPTED in its entirety as the decision of the Court. Defendant's motion to remand is GRANTED, and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security. The Clerk is directed to close the motion at Docket No. 19, terminate this case and mail a copy of this Opinion to the pro se Plaintiff. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 11/5/2015) (kgo)

Download PDF
Villarreal v. Commissioner of Social Security UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------X : CARMEN I. VILLARREAL, Plaintiff, : : : -against: : : CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner : of Social Security, : Defendant. : -------------------------------------------------------------X Doc. 27 11/5/15 13 Civ. 6253 (LGS) OPINION AND ORDER LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Michael H. Dolinger (the “Report”), recommending that Defendant’s motion to remand the case to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings be granted. For the reasons stated below, the Report is adopted in its entirety. Plaintiff Carmen I. Villarreal, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on September 4, 2013, seeking judicial review of a decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for disability insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income. This case was referred to Judge Dolinger on October 11, 2013. On April 28, 2014, Defendant moved to remand this action to the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On August 20, 2015, Judge Dolinger issued the Report to which no objection was filed. A district court reviewing a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district court “may adopt those portions of the report to which ‘no specific, written objection’ is made, as long as the factual and legal bases supporting Dockets.Justia.com the findings and conclusions set forth in those sections are not clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Adams v. N.Y. State Dep’t of Educ., 855 F. Supp. 2d 205, 206 (S.D.N.Y.2012) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). The factual and legal bases underlying the Report are not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Accordingly, the Report is ADOPTED in its entirety as the decision of the Court. Defendant’s motion to remand is GRANTED, and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security. The Clerk is directed to close the motion at Docket No. 19, terminate this case and mail a copy of this Opinion to the pro se Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 5, 2015 New York, New York 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.