Perry et al v. Estates of Donald Byrd et al, No. 1:2013cv01555 - Document 60 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: The Defendants in each of these actions have moved to dismiss on the grounds of, inter alia, res judicata and/or collateral estoppel and a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff has countered with "motions for judgment against the Defendants." The Court has consolidated the cases for the purposes of resolving these motions. For the reasons stated below, the Defendants' motions to dismiss are granted. For the reasons outlined above, the Defendants' m otions to dismiss are GRANTED without leave to amend. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close each of the files and to terminate all pending matters. This Court also certifies that any appeal by Plaintiff from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore denies in forma pauperis status for the purpose of any such appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438,444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 7/03/2014) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ama)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.