Cucuta v. New York City Police Department et al, No. 1:2013cv00558 - Document 84 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)
Court Description: OPINION & ORDER 104473: As set forth within, in the interest of justice and in this Court's discretion, Cucuta's apparent indigency warrants a reduction in the award of costs. Accordingly, this Court reduces the award of costs from $1,094.88 to $750.00. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck on 7/3/2014) Copies Mailed by Chambers. (ajs) Modified on 7/3/2014 (ajs). Modified on 7/3/2014 (nt).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------x ABRAHAM CUCUTA, Plaintiff, -againstCITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants. : : 13 Civ. 0558 (AJP) : OPINION & ORDER : : -------------------------------------x ANDREW J. PECK, United States Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff Abraham Cucuta filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"), which Chief Judge Preska granted on October 15, 2013. (Dkt. No. 1: Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; Dkt. No. 20: Order Granting IFP Application.) On May 9, 2014, this Court granted the defendants' summary judgment motion and dismissed this lawsuit. (See Dkt. No. 80: Opinion & Order.) On June 19, 2014, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d), the Clerk of Court entered a Bill of Costs in favor of defendants totaling $1,094.88, $983.20 of which was attributable to deposition transcripts. (Dkt. No. 82: Bill of Costs.) On June 24, 2014, Cucuta filed a letter arguing that his IFP status relieves him of responsibility for the costs identified in the Bill of Costs. (Dkt. No. 83: 6/24/14 Cucuta Letter.) Contrary to Cucuta's assertion, the IFP statute and caselaw make clear that Cucuta's in forma pauperis status does not automatically excuse him from paying costs. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(f)(2)(A) ("If the judgment against a prisoner includes the payment of costs under this subsection, the prisoner shall be required to pay the full amount of the costs ordered."); see, e.g., D'Attore v. City of N.Y., 10 Civ. 6646, 2014 WL 173482 at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2014) ("28 U.S.C. 2 § 1915(f) expressly permits costs to be taxed against indigent prisoners . . . ."); McMunn v. Mem'l Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr., 97 Civ. 5857, 2003 WL 22910079 at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 9, 2003) ("[C]osts may be awarded against a losing party even if that party would have difficulty in paying the judgment and even if the party appeared in forma pauperis."); Martin v. Ashcroft, 96 Civ. 7646, 2002 WL 31119434 at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 24, 2002) (same). Nevertheless, in the interest of justice and in this Court's discretion, Cucuta's apparent indigency warrants a reduction in the award of costs. See, e.g., D'Attore v. City of N.Y., 2014 WL 173482 at *2. Accordingly, this Court reduces the award of costs from $1,094.88 to $750.00. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York July 3, 2014 ________________________________ Andrew J. Peck United States Magistrate Judge Copies to: Counsel (ECF) Cucuta (Mail)
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
