Best v. A.C.S. et al, No. 1:2012cv07874 - Document 93 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: On August 21, 2013, the Court received a letter from pro se plaintiff Bishop Frank Best. The Court views this letter as Best's attempt to update the Court as to Family Court proceedings, as was requested during the March 21, 2 013 Initial Pre-Trial Conference. For clarity's sake, the Court stresses that this letter will not be viewed as additional briefing on defendants' pending motions to dismiss. These motions are now fully briefed and, accordingly, the Court e xpects that defendants will promptly submit courtesy copies of the motion papers - in well-organized three ring binder(s) - as set forth in my Individual Rules of Practice. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 8/26/2013) Copies Sent By Chambers. (ja)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------X Bishop Frank BEST, Plaintiff, -against- 8/26/2013 12-CV-07874 (RJS)(SN) OPINION AND ORDER A.C.S., et al., Defendants. -----------------------------------------------------------------X SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: On August 21, 2013, the Court received a letter from pro se plaintiff Bishop Frank Best. The Court views this letter as Best s attempt to update the Court as to Family Court proceedings, as was requested during the March 21, 2013 Initial Pre-Trial Conference. For clarity s sake, the Court stresses that this letter will not be viewed as additional briefing on defendants pending motions to dismiss. These motions are now fully briefed and, accordingly, the Court expects that defendants will promptly submit courtesy copies of the motion papers in well-organized three ring binder(s) as set forth in my Individual Rules of Practice. SO ORDERED. DATED: New York, New York August 26, 2013 cc: Bishop Frank Best 131-19 Farmers Blvd Queens, NY 11434

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.