Adelson v. Harris et al, No. 1:2012cv06052 - Document 80 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: re: 26 MOTION to Strike Document No. 18 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss filed by Sheldon G. Adelson, 27 MOTION to Strike Document No. 20 Declaration of Rachel F. Strom filed by Sheldon G. Ade lson, 56 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Nevada Anti-SLAPP Statute at the direction of the Court filed by National Jewish Democratic Council, Marc R. Stanley, David A. Harris, 17 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Na tional Jewish Democratic Council, Marc R. Stanley, David A. Harris, 77 MOTION for order granting leave to file supplemental authority. re: 56 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Nevada Anti-SLAPP Statute at the direction of the Court filed by S heldon G. Adelson, 16 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to D.C. Anti-SLAPP Statute filed by National Jewish Democratic Council, Marc R. Stanley, David A. Harris, 65 MOTION for Discovery Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d) to Oppo se Defendants Nevada Anti-SLAPP Motion filed by Sheldon G. Adelson. For the foregoing reasons, it is hereby ordered that: Defendants' motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule 12(b)(6) is GRANTED; Defendants' special motion to dismiss pursuant to the Nevada Anti-SLAPP statute is GRANTED; Defendants' special motion to dismiss pursuant to the District of Columbia Anti-SLAPP statute is DENIED;Plaintiffs motion to strike is DENIED as moot; and Plaintiffs motion for discovery is D ENIED; Pursuant to N.R.S. § 41.670(1), Defendants' request for reasonable attorney's fees and costs is GRANTED. Defendants shall file a statement of their reasonable fees and costs on or before October 15, 2013, to which Plaintiff may respond on or before October 29, 2013. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions at docket numbers 16, 17, 26, 27,56, 65, and 77. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 9/30/2013) (ama)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.