Taylor v. New York City Department of Education et al, No. 1:2011cv07833 - Document 31 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

Court Description: OPINION re: 24 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. filed by Brenda Hollomon, 21 MOTION to Dismiss. filed by The City of New York, Nancy Velez, New York City Department of Education. Defendants' motion to dismiss is G RANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Pursuant to the Court's individual rules, after Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on March 19, 2012, Plaintiff was given the option of amending her complaint in response to the motion to dismiss. Plaintiff a vailed herself of this opportunity and filed the Amended Complaint, leading Defendants to file motions to dismiss in early May of 2012. (D.E. 17, 19, 21, 24). Because Plaintiff was afforded an opportunity to amend her complaint to cure its defects, t he Court's dismissal ofthe DOE and City of New York is with prejudice. An Initial Pretrial Conference is set for September 21, 2012, at 4:30 pm. The parties are directed to the Court's March 5, 2012 order regarding the materials that must be submitted in advance of that conference and the deadline for doing so. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/6/2012) (jfe)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.