Makinen et al v. City of New York et al, No. 1:2011cv07535 - Document 64 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons stated above, Defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 32) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs' claims against the NYPD are dismissed in their entirety, as are Counts VI through XI of the Amended Complaint. Counts I through III are dismissed with respect to Plaintiff Nardini only. Plaintiffs' cross-motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 33) is DENIED. re: 33 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Kathleen Makinen, Jamie Nardini, Angel Torres, 32 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by New York City Police Department, Raymond W. Kelly, Daniel J. Sweeney, City of New York. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 9/30/2014) (rjm)

Download PDF
Makinen et al v. City of New York et al Doc. 64 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.