Houston v. Schriro et al, No. 1:2011cv07374 - Document 180 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER re: 101 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Rosamund Padmore, Rutherford Cipio, Curt Walker, Artemio Colon, Richard Wolf, Brian Martin, Winette Halyard-Saunders, Johnson, Webb, Rose Agro, S. Brown, Dora B. S chriro, Jones, Yvette Bowers, Thomas Hall, Arthur Harris: For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's claims regarding dental care, destruction of property, inadequate footwear, and supervisory liability. The motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's claims concerning strip searches and the denial of low-sodium halal meals. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 11/24/2014) (tn)

Download PDF
Houston v. Schriro et al Doc. 180 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.