Irving H. Picard v. Saul B. Katz et al, No. 1:2011cv03605 - Document 41 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER: In connection with today's in court conference at 3:00 P.M., the parties should be prepared to set a briefing schedule on the unresolved issue referred to in footnote six at page eleven of yesterday's Opinion and Order. As a result of that Opinion and Order, the most that the Trustee can recover from the defendants is the total of all transfers made during two-year period prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition, which, according to the Amended Complaint, appears to be approximately $386 million. However, it remains an open question whether, in determining what portion of that sum should be considered principal and what portion profits, reference should be made only to that period or should be made to earlier transfers as well. The Court wishes to resolve this issue promptly after briefing by the parties. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 9/28/2011) (mro) (Entered: 09/28/2011)

Download PDF
- - - - ... Irving H. Picard v. Saul B. Katz et al Doc. 41 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x IRVING H. PICARD, Plaintiff, 11 Civ. 3605 (JSR) v SAUL B. KATZ et al., ORDER Defendants. - -- -- ---- -- x JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J. In connection with today's in court conference at 3:00 P.M., the part s should be prepared to set a briefing schedule on the unresolved issue referred to in footnote six at page eleven of yesterday's Opinion and Order. As a result of that Opinion and Order, the most that the Trustee can recover from the defendants is the total of all transfers made during two-year period prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition, which, according to the Amended Complaint, appears to be approximately $386 million. 1108. Amended Complaint However, it remains an open question whether, in determining what portion of that sum should be considered principal and what portion profits, reference should be made only to that period or should be made to earlier transfers as well. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC Aug. 16, 2011). 1 F.3d -I See In re Bernard L. 2011 WL 3568936 at *12 n.10 (2d Cir. The Court wishes to resolve this issue promptly after briefing by the parties. Dockets.Justia.com SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York September 28/ 2011 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.