Johnston et al v. Apple, Inc., No. 1:2011cv03321 - Document 40 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER: Pending before the Court is the motion of defendants Apple Inc. and Omniscient Investigation Corporation to dismiss plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint. After full consideration of the parties' briefs and oral argument and for reasons that will be explained in a forthcoming written opinion, the Court hereby dismisses with prejudice claims one and two of the Complaint, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1982 and New York State Executive Law § 296. With respect to plaintiffs' third claim, brought under the Administrative Code of the City Of New York § 8-107, the Court has neither diversity jurisdiction under 28U.S.C. § 1332 nor federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §1331. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367, and plaintiffs' third claim will therefore be dismissed without prejudice once final judgment issues. Final judgment, however, will not issue until the Court issues its written opinion referenced above. Meanwhile, all further discovery and proceedings in this case are stayed. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 9/15/2011) (js) (Entered: 09/16/2011)

Download PDF
Johnston et al v. Apple, Inc. Doc. 40 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x BRIAN JOHNSTON and NILE CHARLES, Plaintiffs, -v- 11 Civ. 3321(JSR) ORDER APPLE INC. and OMNISCIENT INVESTIGATION CORPORATION, Defendants. ------ x JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J. Pending before the Court is the motion of defendants Apple Inc. and Omniscient Investigation Corporation to dismiss plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint. After full consideration of the part s' briefs and oral argument and for reasons that will be explained in a forthcoming written opinion, the Court hereby dismisses with prejudice claims one and two of the Complaint, brought under 42 U.S.C. and New York State Executive Law § 296. § 8-107, Code of the City Of New the Court has neither diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. The Court decl 28 U.S.C. 1332 nor federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1982 With respect to plaintiffs' thi.rd claim, brought under the Administrat York § to exercise supplemental j 1367, and plaintiffs' § sdiction under third claim will therefore be dismissed without prejudice once final judgment issues. Final judgment, however, will not issue until the Court issues its written opinion referenced above. Meanwhile, 1 further discovery and proceedings in this case are stayed. Dockets.Justia.com SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York September 1;{, 2011 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.