-DCF Pushkin v. Nussbaum et al, No. 1:2010cv09212 - Document 106 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth within, the plaintiff's motion for default judgment is denied. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 8/12/2011) (ab)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAVID B. PUSHKIN, Plaintiff, - against - 10 Civ. 9212 (JGK) (DCF MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BETH NUSSBAUM, ET AL., Defendants. JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: Pro se plaintiff David Pushkin moves for a default judgment against defendants Aronsohn Weiner and Salerno, L.L.C. and Kevin L. Bremer. The plaintiff argues that a default judgment is proper because these defendants did not appear in response to the process that was mailed to them with an acknowledgment and waiver of service form earlier this year. However, it is plain that the defendants have not failed to plead or otherwise defend this case within the terms of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55, and thus a default judgment should not be entered. Any alleged failure to respond timely was not willful. Moreover, this Court maintains a strong preference for resolving disputes on the merits, rather than on the basis of procedural issues. See Enron Oil Corp. v. Diakuhara, 10 F.3d 90, 95 (2d Cir. 1993). The defendants have demonstrated a desire to defend against the claims in this case. Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion for a default judgment is denied. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York August;J.., 2011 tates District Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
