Perez v. Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al, No. 1:2010cv08278 - Document 318 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

Court Description: OPINION re: 262 FIRST MOTION for Attorney Fees (refiled), filed by Christopher P Keenan, 265 MOTION for New Trial, MOTION to Alter Judgment re: 250 Clerk's Judgment, filed by Progenics Pharmaceut icals, Inc; 257 MOTION for an Order granting prejudgment interest, filed by Julio Perez, 259 MOTION Plaintiff's Reinstatement, filed by Julio Perez. Accordingly, the Court denies Defendant's motion for remittitur. The previously-entered judgment (ECF No. 250) is withdrawn. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion for prejudgment interest (ECF No. 257) is granted. The parties shall re-calculate prejudgment interest through September 9, 2016 (or the ne arest month end), consistent with the resolutions herein, and submit those re-calculations no later than September 8. Plaintiff's motion for reinstatement (ECF No. 259) is granted as to his front pay claim in the amount of $2,706,585.0 0. The motion by Plaintiff's former counsel, Westermann, Sheehy, Keenan, Samaan, & Aydelott, LLP, for attorney's fees (ECF No. 262) is denied in part as to the attorney's fees and granted in part as to leave to renew its motion for a charging lien, provided that the motion is filed no later than September 9. The Court will allow Plaintiff ten days from the Court's entry of a charging lien to file his motion for attorney's fees. Defendant's motion for a new trial or, in the alternative, for remittitur (ECF No. 265) is denied. (As further set forth in this Opinion) (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 8/30/2016) (kl)