Robinson v. Henschel et al, No. 1:2010cv06212 - Document 91 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 70 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 88 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Defendants Ercole, Steinbaugh, Fraser, Wilson, Kaufman, Kohler, Huttel, and Arrick's motion for summary judg ment on Plaintiff's claims regarding the cell door and the pat frisk incidents on April 24, 2007 is granted. Defendants' motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs' claims regarding the May 10, 2007 incident is denied. Defendants' motion for permission to reply to Plaintiff's February 11, 2014 letter is denied as moot. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motions (Dkt. Nos. 70, 88). The Clerk is further ordered to terminate as defendants J. Henschel, Sgt. Ward, T. Lucas, Correction Officer Titka, K. Johnson, Macko, Caron, Superintendent Phillips, Sullivon, Lieutenant Alexander, R. Hamilton, T. Stevens, Schmitt, Correction Officer R. Ward, Novoa, Prison Medical Staffs RN Staff, Krause, and B. Roberts. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Latee Robinson, 06-A-1498, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Box 51, Comstock, NY 12821-0051. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 3/26/2014) (mro)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.