Kang v. USA, No. 1:2010cv03684 - Document 7 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, the Government's time to move or respond is extended to November 26, 2010. As outlines in the Court's previous order, the Government shall submit transcripts of all proceedings, any briefs submitte d on appeal, and the record in any post-conviction proceedings along with its responsive papers. The Government shall also address, as appropriate, the proper procedural handling of this case under the Antiterrorism and effective death Penalty Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-132, 110 Stat 1214 (1996). The petitioner's time to reply to the Government's response is December 31, 2010. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/27/2010) (js)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Kang v. USA Doc. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAE KANG, 10 civ. 3684 (JGK) Petitioner, - against - MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: In an order dated May 25, 2010, the Government was directed to answer or move with respect to the petition for habeas corpus within 60 days of receipt of the order. The Government has not done so. Accordingly, the Government's time to move or respond is extended to November 26, 2010. As outlined in the Court's previous order, the Government shall submit transcripts of all proceedings, any briefs submitted on appeal, and the record in any post-conviction proceedings along with its responsive papers. The Government shall also address, as appropriate, the proper procedural handling of this case under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 (1996). The petitioner's time to reply to the Government's response is December 31, 2010. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York October 27, 2010 States District Judge lusris SDNY DOCPMFNT D()( 11; FILED 1 - DATE FILED: Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
