Waite v. Schoenbach et al, No. 1:2010cv03439 - Document 18 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

Court Description: OPINION: For the reasons set forth above, Defendants' motion to dismiss [#11] is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants' motion to dismiss the claim for breach of contract against Lifelinks and Healinc Telecom is denied. Defendants& #039; motion to dismiss the claims for piercing the corporate veil, fraud, fraudulent conveyance, and constructive fraud against Lifelinks and Healinc Telecom is granted. Defendants' motion to dismiss the claims against Schoenbach, Uscher, Lifelinks VRI, and Healine is granted. (Signed by Judge Richard M. Berman on 10/29/2010) (jfe)

Download PDF
Waite v. Schoenbach et al Doc. 18 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.