Pillco v. Bradt, No. 1:2010cv02393 - Document 6 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, the Petition is hereby dismissed. The final question is whether to grant a Certificate of Appealability ("COA"). For a COA to issue, a petitioner must make a "substantial s howing of the denial of a constitutional right." A "substantial showing" does not require a petitioner to demonstrate that he would prevail on the merits, but merely that reasonable jurists could debate whether "the petition shoul d have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were 'adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further." Petitioner has made no such showing. Accordingly, I decline to grant a certificate of appealability. The Clerk of the Court is directed to dismiss the instant Petition and close this case. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 8/26/2010) (jpo)

Download PDF
Pillco v. Bradt Doc. 6

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.