Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd. et al v. The Republic of Argentina, No. 1:2009cv10620 - Document 30 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

Court Description: OPINION: For these reasons, the motion to confirm the process of February 23,2010 is denied, and the motion to vacate such process is granted. In response to the application of plaintiffs, the implementation of the court's ruling is stayed unti l further order of the court. The purpose is to allow a brief time to consider whether there should be a stay pending appeal, and to consider whether there can be a stay which would allow normal business in the custodial accounts to be carried on. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 3/5/2010) (jpo)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.