Island Intellectual Property LLC et al v. Promontory Interfinancial Network, LLC et al, No. 1:2009cv02675 - Document 58 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER:#98066 Other than by implicitly arguing for a per se rule preventing lead trial counsel Mr. Macedo from also engaging in patent prosecution, defendants have not made a sufficient factual showing as to why Mr. Macedo should be subjec t to a patent prosecution bar. Particularly here, where the attorney at issue is the lead trial counsel for the adversary, the Court will not impose a patent prosecution bar on him on this record. The Court adheres to its prior decision (see Dkt. No. 46) and denies defendants' Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. No. 47). (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck on 9/23/2009) Copies Faxed By Chambers.(jfe) Modified on 9/25/2009 (jab).