Herrera-Gomez v. USA, No. 1:2008cv07299 - Document 14 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: To the extent that the petitioners motion requests a Certificate of Appealability to appeal the denial of his initial habeas petition, filed August 18, 2008 and denied in the Courts Memorandum Opinion and Order dated Nov ember 25, 2009, the petitioners request is denied. To the extent that the petitioner requests a Certificate of Appealability in order to file a second and successive habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, his request is denied. In petitio ning the Court of Appeals for leave to file a second and successive habeas petition, the petitioner should explain the basis for his application, with specific reference to the factors provided in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h), a copy of which is attached to this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/31/2014) (kgo)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JUAN CARLOS HERRERA-GOMEZ, Petitioner, - against - 08 Civ. 7299 (JGK) 05 Cr. 495 (JGK) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: The Court has received the attached correspondence from the petitioner, Juan Carlos Herrera-Gomez, in which the petitioner seeks a Certificate of Appealability to file a second or successive habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. In his correspondence, the petitioner has attached a financial statement that contains personal financial information and is therefore filed under seal. To the extent that the petitioner s motion requests a Certificate of Appealability to appeal the denial of his initial habeas petition, filed August 18, 2008 and denied in the Court s Memorandum Opinion and Order dated November 25, 2009, the petitioner s request is denied. The Court declined to issue a Certificate of Appealability in its opinion of November 25, 2009 because the petitioner had failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, and the petitioner has not proffered any additional basis in support of the required substantial showing. To the extent that the petitioner requests a Certificate of Appealability in order to file a second and successive habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, his request is denied, because the petitioner s request to file a second and successive habeas petition is properly made to the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h); see also, e.g., Ortiz v. New York, 75 F. App x 14, 17 (2d Cir. 2003) (summary order). The petitioner should submit his request to file a second and successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. In petitioning the Court of Appeals for leave to file a second and successive habeas petition, the petitioner should explain the basis for his application, with specific reference to the factors provided in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h), a copy of which is attached to this Order. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York March 31, 2014 _______________/s/____________ John G. Koeltl United States District Judge MARCH 22 2014 CLERK OF THE COURT Honorable Judge: John G. Koeltl UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 500 Pearl St. NEW YORK, NEW YORK. 10007-1312 Casei S2-05-CR-495(JGK) JUAN CARLOS HERRERA GOMEZ f: 58020-054 NEOCC 2240 Hubbard Rd. YOUNGSTOWN, OHIO. 44505 MOTION REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY I Juan Carlos Herrera Gomez, a Federal Inmate in Custody ask this Honorable Court for a Certificate of appealability to file a second or successive motion under section 2255. I and to a~k this court to allow me tq proceed in pro-se form ~rant this petition fqr appeal. Tne basis for appeal are with ~ertt and evidence will be provide~ ~or review, I have been doing res~arcb on my case, and f~el that I can proof the allegations witnin. I am an incarcerated appeallant who can not afford to pay the fee and asks thi9 PAUPERIS,. Facility ~ttqch (p~~son}, Cou~t to allow me to prqceed in FORMA ip a copy of my Financial statement from this +o+ the past (6) six months, to state my case for indingent Inmate. In doing so I ask this Court to proceed in a less stringent matter and consider the fact that I am not an expert of the interpretation of the Law, and that I am not a u.s Citizen therefore a language barrier has a burden on myself. I will appreciate any consideration on the review and its contants,. I will also appreciate the granting of both issues for a proper proceeding, 1# Certificate of appealablity and the Financial burden and allow me to proceed in Forma Pauperis. I want to thank you for your time and help in this matter. ~ERELY
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
