Lidle et al v. Cirrus Design Corporation, No. 1:2008cv01253 - Document 209 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER re: 70 MOTION to Strike. filed by Cirrus Design Corporation, 66 MOTION to Strike. filed by Cirrus Design Corporation, 62 MOTION to Strike. filed by Cirrus Design Corporation, 74 MOTION to Strike. filed by Cirrus Design Corpo ration, 82 MOTION for Summary Judgment. filed by Cirrus Design Corporation, 78 MOTION to Strike. filed by Cirrus Design Corporation. For the reasons set forth above, Defendant's Motion to Strike the Expert Opinions of Hughes, Kumar, Leffe, Lind, and Llorente are Denied and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED (Signed by Judge Barbara S. Jones on 7/6/10) (djc)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.