IN RE GIANT INTERACTIVE GROUP, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, No. 1:2007cv10588 - Document 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

Court Description: OPINION:#97861 For the reasons stated above, Defendants' motion to dismiss the CAC is denied. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 8/5/2009) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:07-cv-10588-RWS, 1:07-cv-11423-RWS(jfe) Modified on 8/11/2009 (jab).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 07 Civ. 10588 (RWS) In re GIANT INTERACTIVE GROUP, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: OPINION - ALL ACTIONS .................................. A P P E A R A N C E S : X Attorneys for Plaintiffs ?... COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 58 South Service Road, Suite 200 Melville, NY 11747 By: Mario Alba, Jr., Esq. Samuel H. Rudman, Esq. ABRAHAM FRUCHTER & TWERSKY LLP One Pennsylvania Plaza, Sulte 2805 New York, NY 10119 By: Jack G. Fruchter, Esq. BRODSKY & SMITH, L.L.C. 240 Mineola Bivd. Mineola, NY 11501 By: Even J. Smith, Esq Attorneys for Defendants O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 7 Times Square New York, NY 10036 By: Jonathan Rosenberg, Esq. Lori E. Romley, Esq. Meredith N. Landy, Esq. Seth Aronson, Esq. ~ SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 7 8 7 S e v e n t h Avenue N e w York, NY 1 0 0 1 9 By: A l f r e d R. P i e t r z a k , Esq. Andrew S . S t e r n , E s q . Dorothy J. Spenner, Esq. Vikeena K. Bonett, Esq.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.