Brown v. Coleman et al, No. 1:2007cv01345 - Document 90 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 70 Memorandum & Opinion, 62 MOTION for Reconsideration re: 58 Memorandum & Opinion filed by Luisa Gutti Brown, 58 Memorandum & Opinion, 61 Objection (non-motion) filed by Luisa Gutti Brown. In any event, plaintiff& #039;s objection to Judge Ellis' Memorandum Opinion and Order of September 8, 2009 is overruled, and that order is affirmed, because plaintiff has not shown that the order was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Defendant Coleman's couns el also points to defendant Wemm's motion for summary judgment. That motion is decided in a Memorandum and Order of even date herewith. Defendant Coleman's counsel also States that he wishes to file a motion for summary judgment on behalf of Dr. Coleman. Any such motion is to be filed not later than March 15, 2010. (Signed by Judge Lawrence M. McKenna on 3/4/2010) (jar)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Brown v. Coleman et al Doc. 90 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------x LUISA GUTTI BROWN, : Plaintiff, - against SYDNEY COLEMAN, M.D., KENNETH WEMM, M.D. and TRIBECA PLASTIC SURGERY, Defendants. : 07 Civ. 1345 (LMM) : MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : : : -----------------------------------x McKENNA, D.J., By letter dated February 23, 2010, counsel for defendant Coleman has suggested that there are unresolved matters to be resolved before trial. Plaintiff had objected to a ruling on a discovery matter by Judge Ellis. Opinion and plaintiff’s (See Document # 58, Judge Ellis’ Memorandum Order of September objection thereto.) 8, 2009, and Plaintiff, Document in # addition 61, to objecting, moved for reconsideration by Judge Ellis. (See Document # 62.) After considering plaintiff’s arguments, Judge Ellis denied reconsideration. (See Document # 70.) Plaintiff has not filed an objection to Judge Ellis’ denial of reconsideration, and the time to do so has expired. The Court does not believe that, in these circumstances, any further action by the Court is required, nor has plaintiff argued that the objection remains to be dealt with. In Dockets.Justia.com any event, plaintiff's objection to Judge Ellis' Memorandum Opinion and Order of September 8, affirmed, because 2009 is overruled, plaintiff has not shown Coleman's counsel Wemm's motion for summary judgment. that 28 U.S.C. clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Defendant and that order is also § points the order was 636(b) (1) (A). to defendant That motion is decided in a Memorandum and Order of even date herewith. Defendant Coleman's counsel also States that he wishes to file a motion for summary judgment on behalf of Dr. Coleman. such motion is to be filed not later than March 15, 2010. Dated: March 'I, SO ORDERED. 2010 Lawrence M. McKenna U.S.D.J. 2 Any
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
