RFMAS, Inc. v. So et al, No. 1:2006cv13114 - Document 143 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

Court Description: AMENDED DECISION AND ORDER re: 97 FIRST MOTION for Summary Judgment Notice filed by RFMAS, Inc., 87 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Mimi So, Mimi So International, Inc., 89 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA, Richemont Holdings I, Richemont SA, Richemont North America, Richemont International, Ltd. The motion (Docket No. 97) of R.F.M.A.S., Inc. ("RFMAS") for summary judgment as to the So Defendants is DENIED in its entirety. The motion (Docket No. 97) of RFMAS for summary jUdgment as to the Richemont Defendants is DENIED in its entirety. The motion (Docket No. 89) of Richemont SA, Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA, Richemont North America, Richemont Holdings I, and Richemon t International, Ltd. for summary judgment is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. The motion (Docket No. 87) of Mimi So and Mimi So International, Inc. for summary judgment is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 3/31/2009) (tve)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.