Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. Steinbeck et al, No. 1:2006cv02438 - Document 32 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 13 Motion for Summary Judgment. Because defendant failed to demonstrate the absence of a genuine issue regarding performance ofcontractual condition, the record does not reflect whether Penguin's obligatio n to pay ever matured. See Restatement of Law (Second) of Contracts § 225(1) (1981) ("Performance of a duty subject to a condition cannot become due unless the condition occurs or its non-occurrence is excused."). Defendant has made an insufficient showing that there are no triable issues of fact and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on his breach of contract counterclaim. Defendant's motion for summary judgment on his counterclaim against Penguin is denied. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 3/31/2009) (tve)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.