Pension Committe of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. CITCO Fund Services N.V., No. 1:2005cv09016 - Document 347 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: #98658 For the aforementioned reasons, Plaintiffs' motion in limine to exclude Onefater's proposed testimony is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this motion (Docket No. 340). SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/9/2010) (jmi) Modified on 3/12/2010 (ajc).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.