Securities and Exchange Commission v. Amerindo Investment Advisors Inc. et al, No. 1:2005cv05231 - Document 688 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

Court Description: OPINION & ORDER re: 671 MOTION for Reargument re: 653 Order, Set Deadlines, 651 Response to Motion, 660 Order on Motion for Compensation, 669 Memorandum & Opinion, 655 Response to Motion, 666 Letter, 652 Declaration in O pposition to Motion, [670 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 669 Memorandum & Opinion, 670 Order, filed by Techno Raquia, S.A., Amerindo Advisors UK Limited, Gary Alan Tanaka, Amerindo Technology Growth Fund, Inc., Amerindo Investment A dvisors Inc., Amerindo Investment Advisors, Inc., Amerindo Technology Growth Fund II, Inc., Alberto William Vilar, Amerindo Management Inc. The instant motion for reconsideration simply presents the same arguments already rejected by this Court , as well as a prudential argument that the Court should stay any further distributions in this civil matter until after it has ruled on Defendants' pending habeas petitions. None of these arguments warrants reconsideration of the Court's J uly 17, 2017 Order, and Defendants' motion is therefore DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at docket number 671, and as further set forth herein. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 11/29/2017) (ras)

Download PDF
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Amerindo Investment Advisors Inc. et al Doc. 688

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.