Raedle v. Credit Agricole Indosuez et al, No. 1:2004cv02235 - Document 76 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

Court Description: OPINION: For the reasons stated above, plaintiffs motion for pre-judgment interest is denied. Plaintiffs motion for post-verdict interest is granted. Plaintiffs motion for costs is denied without prejudice to renew his application in conformity with Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d) and Local Civil Rule 54.1(a). Parties to submit judgment on notice. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 6/11/2010) (jpo)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.