Smith v. Reardon, No. 9:2022cv00732 - Document 8 (N.D.N.Y 2022)

Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that petitioner's letter notifying the Court that he wishes to convert his federal habeas petition from one brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 to one brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is GRANTED. ORDE RED that the Clerk is respectfully directed to provide petitioner with a blank §2254 habeas petition. ORDERED that if petitioner fails to file an amended petition within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order, the Cl erk shall enter judgment dismissing this action without further order. ORDERED that upon the filing of any amended petition, the Clerk shall forward the file to the Court for further review. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on August 16, 2022. ( Notice of Compliance Deadline 9/16/2022, Case Review Deadline 10/17/2022){order and blank 2254 form served via regular mail on petitioner} (nas )

Download PDF
Smith v. Reardon Doc. 8 Case 9:22-cv-00732-BKS Document 8 Filed 08/16/22 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PERRY F. SMITH, JR., Petitioner, v. 9:22-CV-0732 (BKS) REARDON, Superintendent, Respondent. APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: PERRY F. SMITH, JR. Petitioner, pro se 22-B-1570 Marcy Correctional Facility P.O. Box 3600 Marcy, NY 13403 BRENDA K. SANNES United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Petitioner Perry Smith sought federal habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Dkt. No. 1, Petition ("Pet."). On August 3, 2022, this Court granted petitioner thirty days leave to clarify whether he: (1) consented to having his § 2241 petition converted into a § 2254 petition; or (2) wanted to voluntarily withdraw the pending petition instead of having it converted. Dkt. No. 6, Decision and Order ("August Order"), at 5, 7-8. Petitioner was also directed that, if he chose to consent to conversion, he would need to file an amended petition to properly plead exhaustion of his state court remedies. Id. at 6-7. Presently pending before the Court is a letter responding to the August Order. Dkt. No. 7. In it, petitioner expresses his "desire [to do] the conversion." Id. at 1. Petitioner also Dockets.Justia.com Case 9:22-cv-00732-BKS Document 8 Filed 08/16/22 Page 2 of 3 "await[s the Court's] new form for [his] completion." Id. Petitioner indicates that he has "surely tried over and over again [to exhaust his state court remedies] without the least bit of success," and states that he has an attorney who represented him. Id. It is still unclear to the Court whether [petitioner] filed a direct appeal of the sentence he received as a result of the probation revocation proceedings or the status of that challenge. Accordingly, the Court cannot determine whether proper exhaustion has occurred. . . . [Therefore, petitioner] is [again] directed to file an amended petition within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order that addresses if and how he has exhausted his state court remedies, as outlined below. August Order at 6-7 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). Accordingly, with the form § 2254 petition provided to petitioner by the Court, he is directed to fully complete each and every part of the blank petition. The amended petition must clearly list the date(s) on which petitioner filed any application(s) in state court for direct or collateral review concerning his probation revocation, the name and location of the court in which he filed each application, and the date on which each court denied each application. Petitioner must also clearly state each claim he wants the court to consider, and the facts supporting each claim, in the petition. WHEREFORE, it is ORDERED that petitioner's letter notifying the Court that he wishes to convert his federal habeas petition from one brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 to one broug ht pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk is respectfully directed to provide petitioner with a blank § 2254 habeas petition. Petitioner shall fully complete each and every part of the blank 2 Case 9:22-cv-00732-BKS Document 8 Filed 08/16/22 Page 3 of 3 petition. The amended petition must clearly list the date(s) on which petitioner filed any application(s) in state court for direct or collateral review concerning his probation revocation, the name and location of the court in which he filed each application, and the date on which each court denied each application. Petitioner must also clearly state each claim he wants the court to consider, and the facts supporting each claim, in the petition. Petitioner must not incorporate any portion of any prior petition into his amended petition by reference. Petitioner must include all relevant information in the amended petition in accordance with the terms of this Decision and Order; and it is further ORDERED that if petitioner fails to file an amended petition within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order, the Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing this action without further order; and it is further ORDERED that upon the filing of any amended petition, the Clerk shall forward the file to the Court for further review; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Decision and Order on petitioner in accordance with the Local Rules. Dated: August 16, 2022 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.