Blake v. Porlier et al, No. 9:2018cv01008 - Document 31 (N.D.N.Y 2020)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the # 30 Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. Defendant's # 23 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; plaintiff's Amended Complaint is DISMISSED; and the Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 1/6/2020. (Copy served via regular mail)(meb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Blake v. Porlier et al Doc. 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------JOSEPH BLAKE, Plaintiff, -v- 9:18-CV-1008 (DNH/CFH) M. PORLIER, Correction Officer, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Defendant. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: JOSEPH BLAKE Plaintiff, Pro Se 04-B-3582 Attica Correctional Facility Box 149 Attica, NY 14011 HON. LETITIA JAMES Attorney General for the State of New York Attorney for Defendant The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 ERIK BOULE PINSONNAULT, ESQ. Ass't Attorney General DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Pro se plaintiff Joseph Blake brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 4, 2019, the Honorable Christian F. Hum mel, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that defendant’s motion for summary judgment Dockets.Justia.com be granted and that plaintiff’s Amended Complaint be dismissed in its entirety. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed. Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that 1. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint is DISMISSED; and 3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 6, 2020 Utica, New York. -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
