Ayers v. Trombley et al, No. 9:2017cv01229 - Document 27 (N.D.N.Y 2019)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER: The # 24 Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. It is ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (docket # 19 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is GRANTED with respect to p laintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim against defendant Trombley based on exhaustion grounds and that claim is DISMISSED. The motion is DENIED without prejudice with respect to plaintiff's First Amendment Free Exercise claims against defendants Trombley and Bernier based on qualified immunity grounds and those claims shall proceed to trial. Any request for pro bono trial counsel shall be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of this Decision and Order. Trial is scheduled for February 10, 2020, in Utica, New York. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 8/19/2019. (Copy served via regular mail)(meb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Ayers v. Trombley et al Doc. 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------HOWARD AYERS, Plaintiff, -v- 9:17-CV-1229 (DNH/TWD) ZACHARIE TROMBLEY, Food Service Administrator, Barehill Correctional Facility, formerly known as D. Trombley and HENRY BERNIER, Civilian Cook, Barehill Correctional Facility, formerly known as Beriner, Defendants. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: HOWARD AYERS Plaintiff pro se 502 W. 213 Street 3C New York, NY 10034 HON. LETITIA JAMES Attorney General for the State of New York Attorney for Defendant The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 KONSTANDINOS D. LERIS, ESQ. Ass't Attorney General DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Pro se plaintiff Howard Ayers brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 8, 2019, the Honorable Thérèse Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that defendants' motion for summary judgment Dockets.Justia.com be granted in part and denied in part. Specif ically, Magistrate Judge Dancks recommended that the motion be granted as to defendant Trombley on plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim based on exhaustion grounds but that the motion be denied as to defendants Trombley and Bernier on plaintiff's First Amendment Free Exercise claims based on qualified immunity grounds. Defendants timely filed objections to the ReportRecommendation with respect to the qualified immunity issue. Based upon a de novo review of the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which defendants objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; 2. The motion is GRANTED with respect to plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim against defendant Trombley based on exhaustion grounds and that claim is DISMISSED; 3. The motion is DENIED without prejudice with respect to plaintiff's First Amendment Free Exercise claims against defendants Trombley and Bernier based on qualified immunity grounds and those claims shall proceed to trial; 4. Any request for pro bono trial counsel shall be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of this Decision and Order; and 5. Trial is scheduled for February 10, 2020, in Utica, New York. IT IS SO ORDERED. -2- Dated: August 19, 2019 Utica, New York. -3-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
