Hughes v. Smolinski et al, No. 9:2017cv01151 - Document 81 (N.D.N.Y 2019)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER: Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the # 80 Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole.It is ORDERED that Defendants' # 55 and # 64 motions for summary judgm ent are GRANTED; Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and the Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on December 19, 2019. (Copy served via regular mail)(rep) Modified on 12/19/2019 to link entries (rep).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hughes v. Smolinski et al Doc. 81 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------MAURICE HUGHES, Plaintiff, -v- 9:17-CV-1151 (DNH/ML) MAHMOOD BUTT, Doctor, Broome County Jail; BARRY HALL, Health Administrator, Broome County Jail; and MARK SMOLINSKY, Jail Administrator, Defendants. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: MAURICE HUGHES Plaintiff, Pro Se Collins Correctional Facility Post Office Box 640 Collins, New York 14034 STEINBERG, SYMER & PLATT, LLP Attorneys for Defendants Butt and Hall 27 Garden Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 JONATHAN E. SYMER, ESQ. BROOME COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE Attorneys for Defendant Smolinsky 60 Hawley Street, Post Office Box 1766 Binghamton, New York 13902 JENNIFER L. SUWAK, ESQ. DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com DECISION and ORDER Pro se plaintiff Maurice Hughes brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 17, 2019, the Honorable Miroslav Lovric, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that defendants' motions for summary judgment be granted and that plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint be dismissed in its entirety. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed. Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that 1. Defendants' motions for summary judgment are GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and 3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 19, 2019 Utica, New York. -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
