Pridgen v. Beatie et al, No. 9:2016cv00535 - Document 43 (N.D.N.Y 2018)

Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that 41 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. ORDERED that 25 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety, without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 3/19/18. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas, )

Download PDF
Pridgen v. Beatie et al Doc. 43 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------JOSHUA PRIDGEN, Plaintiff, -v- 9:16-CV-535 (DNH/CFH) OFFICER BEATIE, Watertown Correctional Facility, sued in both individual and official capacity, Defendant. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: JOSHUA PRIDGEN Plaintiff pro se 13-R-2638 Auburn Correctional Facility P.O. Box 618 Auburn, NY 13021 HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN Attorney General for the State of New York Attorney for Defendant The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 MICHAEL G. MCCARTIN, ESQ. Ass't Attorney General DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Pro se plaintiff Joshua Pridgen brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 17, 2018, the Honorable Christian F. Hummel, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and that plaintiff's complaint be Dockets.Justia.com dismissed in its entirety, without prejudice. Plaintiff filed timely objections to the ReportRecommendation. Based upon a de novo review of the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which plaintiff objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that 1. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; and 2. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety, without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 19, 2018 Utica, New York. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.