Coleman v. Racette et al, No. 9:2015cv00040 - Document 57 (N.D.N.Y 2017)

Court Description: DECISION & ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the Report-Recommendation (dkt. # 53 ) for the reasons stated therein. The defendants' motion for summary judgment (dkt. # 50 ) is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 6/14/17. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )

Download PDF
Coleman v. Racette et al Doc. 57 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ________________________________________ TOWAUN COLEMAN, Plaintiff, 9:15-CV-40 (TJM/ATB) v. STEVEN RACETTE, et al., Defendants. ________________________________________ THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior United States District Judge DECISION & ORDER I. INTRODUCTION This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred to the Hon. Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). No objections to Magistrate Judge Baxter’s January 17, 2017 Report-Recommendation [dkt. # 53] have been filed, and the time to do so has expired. II. DISCUSSION After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report- Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. III. CONCLUSION Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report-Recommendation [dkt. #53] for the 1 Dockets.Justia.com reasons stated therein. The defendants’ motion for summary judgment [dkt. # 50] is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:June 14, 2017 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.