Geer v. Lewis et al, No. 9:2014cv00650 - Document 9 (N.D.N.Y 2015)

Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER: Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the 8 Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). ORDERED that Plaintiff's First Amendment cla ims against defendants Brown, Whorf, and McMillian are DISMISSED. ORDERED, that all claims against defendants Brown, Whorf, and McMillian are dismissed, the amended complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety. ORDERED, that the Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly, serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules, and close the file. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 2/26/15. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )

Download PDF
Geer v. Lewis et al Doc. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------PAKENAUTH GEER, Plaintiff, No. 9:14-CV-650 (DNH/CFH) -vSERGEANT BROWN, Washington Correctional Facility; ST. MAIL CLERK WHORF, Washington Correctional Facility; and B. MCMILLIAN, Washington Correctional Facility, Defendants. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: PAKENAUTH GEER Plaintiff Pro Se 05-A-1952 Washington Correctional Facility Box 180 72 Lock 11 Lane Comstock, NY 12821 DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Pro se plaintiff Pakenauth Geer brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 28, 2015, the Honorable Christian F. Hummel, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed with prejudice. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed. Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Dockets.Justia.com Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that 1. Plaintiff's First Amendment claims against defendants Brown, Whorf, and McMillian are DISMISSED; 2. As all claims against defendants Brown, Whorf, and McMillian are dismissed, the amended complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety; and 3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly, serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules, and close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 26, 2015 Utica, New York. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.